MinT - Best Known (166, 166+49, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (166, 166+49, s)-Nets in Base 2

(166, 166+49, 201)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (166, 215, 201)-net over F₂, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (2, 26, 6)-net over F₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence (PirÅ¡iÄ‡ implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
2. digital (140, 189, 195)-net over F₂, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 63, 65)-net over F₈, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F₈, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈ with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
        the Suzuki function field over F₈ [i]

(166, 166+49, 379)-Net over F₂ — Digital

Digital (166, 215, 379)-net over F₂, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(166, 166+49, 4702)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (166, 215, 4703)-net in base 2, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (166, 214, 4703)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2^mÂ â‰¥ 26449 007178 393633 191327 216195 311563 061384 646048 044302 985668 619499 > 2²¹⁴ [i]