Best Known (194, 194+49, s)-Nets in Base 2
(194, 194+49, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (194, 243, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (192, 243, 260)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (192, 248, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 62, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 62, 65)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (192, 248, 260)-net over F2, using
(194, 194+49, 595)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (194, 243, 595)-net over F2, using
(194, 194+49, 10599)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (194, 243, 10600)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (194, 242, 10600)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 070192 654046 566415 727496 212665 487656 359730 884503 840481 022170 820397 130156 > 2242 [i]