Best Known (205, 205+49, s)-Nets in Base 2
(205, 205+49, 272)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (205, 254, 272)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (204, 253, 272)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 33, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (9, 33, 12)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(205, 205+49, 708)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (205, 254, 708)-net over F2, using
(205, 205+49, 14576)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (205, 254, 14577)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (205, 253, 14577)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14476 208690 178426 152716 879153 520323 082590 868348 713819 397187 221385 246635 384948 > 2253 [i]