Best Known (136−50, 136, s)-Nets in Base 2
(136−50, 136, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 136, 66)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 142, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
(136−50, 136, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (86, 136, 82)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (18, 68, 41)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 41, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
(136−50, 136, 406)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 136, 407)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 91387 780079 405481 525602 236251 872388 986208 > 2136 [i]