Best Known (240−50, 240, s)-Nets in Base 2
(240−50, 240, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (190, 240, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (189, 240, 260)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
(240−50, 240, 534)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (190, 240, 534)-net over F2, using
(240−50, 240, 7861)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (190, 240, 7862)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 772346 108583 451293 780875 627220 467189 306318 677261 607108 159985 591988 061516 > 2240 [i]