Best Known (242−51, 242, s)-Nets in Base 2
(242−51, 242, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (191, 242, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (189, 242, 260)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
(242−51, 242, 521)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (191, 242, 521)-net over F2, using
(242−51, 242, 8083)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (191, 242, 8084)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (191, 241, 8084)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 543964 010796 621844 016132 266157 829851 478572 652162 376516 720860 078309 356400 > 2241 [i]