Best Known (252−51, 252, s)-Nets in Base 2
(252−51, 252, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (201, 252, 260)-net over F2, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
(252−51, 252, 607)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (201, 252, 607)-net over F2, using
(252−51, 252, 10677)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (201, 252, 10678)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (201, 251, 10678)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3623 261067 946874 666535 929504 013921 979048 730806 758204 464241 294337 766232 752684 > 2251 [i]