Best Known (172, 172+51, s)-Nets in Base 2
(172, 172+51, 202)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (172, 223, 202)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 28, 7)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 7, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (144, 195, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 65, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 65, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (3, 28, 7)-net over F2, using
(172, 172+51, 388)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (172, 223, 388)-net over F2, using
(172, 172+51, 4757)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (172, 223, 4758)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (172, 222, 4758)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 741791 761735 690581 787086 176264 811053 177303 021548 802226 775607 103152 > 2222 [i]