Best Known (200, 200+51, s)-Nets in Base 2
(200, 200+51, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (200, 251, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (198, 251, 260)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (198, 256, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 64, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 64, 65)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (198, 256, 260)-net over F2, using
(200, 200+51, 598)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (200, 251, 598)-net over F2, using
(200, 200+51, 10384)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (200, 251, 10385)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (200, 250, 10385)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1811 626225 143318 403442 382384 252449 764104 458424 864674 146289 168290 746735 464352 > 2250 [i]