Best Known (106, 106+52, s)-Nets in Base 2
(106, 106+52, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 158, 68)-net over F2, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (106, 170, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 85, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 85, 34)-net over F4, using
(106, 106+52, 84)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(106, 158, 84)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 79, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
(106, 106+52, 118)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (106, 158, 118)-net over F2, using
(106, 106+52, 674)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 158, 675)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 369841 774163 528187 843050 534811 654795 735380 286028 > 2158 [i]