Best Known (173, 173+52, s)-Nets in Base 2
(173, 173+52, 200)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (173, 225, 200)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 27, 5)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (146, 198, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 66, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 66, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (1, 27, 5)-net over F2, using
(173, 173+52, 380)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (173, 225, 380)-net over F2, using
(173, 173+52, 4211)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (173, 225, 4212)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 54 125251 895007 694236 106061 114261 543248 052629 039530 829417 911087 802300 > 2225 [i]