Best Known (199, 199+52, s)-Nets in Base 2
(199, 199+52, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (199, 251, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (198, 251, 260)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (198, 256, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 64, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 64, 65)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (198, 256, 260)-net over F2, using
(199, 199+52, 564)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (199, 251, 564)-net over F2, using
(199, 199+52, 8461)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (199, 251, 8462)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3629 372568 469239 154469 672545 147095 172835 314100 576819 772504 608579 077793 572960 > 2251 [i]