Best Known (204, 204+52, s)-Nets in Base 2
(204, 204+52, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (204, 256, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (201, 256, 260)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
(204, 204+52, 608)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (204, 256, 608)-net over F2, using
(204, 204+52, 9672)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (204, 256, 9673)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 115809 490884 464457 708404 706645 078083 525529 818057 819767 570612 059840 869248 240912 > 2256 [i]