Best Known (206, 206+52, s)-Nets in Base 2
(206, 206+52, 263)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (206, 258, 263)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 26, 3)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 3, using
- the rational function field F2(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- Sobol sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (0, 26, 3)-net over F2, using
(206, 206+52, 627)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (206, 258, 627)-net over F2, using
(206, 206+52, 10204)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (206, 258, 10205)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 463410 454771 944452 586879 632610 543494 747227 308027 489305 886638 413046 979136 759790 > 2258 [i]