Best Known (88, 88+52, s)-Nets in Base 2
(88, 88+52, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 140, 66)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (88, 146, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 73, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 73, 33)-net over F4, using
(88, 88+52, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (88, 140, 82)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (18, 70, 41)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 41, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
(88, 88+52, 403)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 140, 404)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 414861 234082 342673 722081 284708 725720 447440 > 2140 [i]