Best Known (245−54, 245, s)-Nets in Base 2
(245−54, 245, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (191, 245, 260)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (190, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
(245−54, 245, 464)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (191, 245, 464)-net over F2, using
(245−54, 245, 5848)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (191, 245, 5849)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56 740421 224125 144659 771566 628949 414696 338939 550586 644699 628055 566025 572040 > 2245 [i]