Best Known (196, 196+54, s)-Nets in Base 2
(196, 196+54, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (196, 250, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (195, 250, 260)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (195, 252, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 63, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 63, 65)-net over F16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (195, 252, 260)-net over F2, using
(196, 196+54, 499)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (196, 250, 499)-net over F2, using
(196, 196+54, 6654)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (196, 250, 6655)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1811 723843 698342 944215 022106 035678 356236 717468 544543 824895 415652 308236 386598 > 2250 [i]