Best Known (205, 205+54, s)-Nets in Base 2
(205, 205+54, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (205, 259, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (201, 259, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
(205, 205+54, 569)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (205, 259, 569)-net over F2, using
(205, 205+54, 8394)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (205, 259, 8395)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 927244 361635 742806 448392 050535 697522 624673 582625 948128 315758 147909 468139 042312 > 2259 [i]