Best Known (258−55, 258, s)-Nets in Base 2
(258−55, 258, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (203, 258, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (201, 258, 260)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
(258−55, 258, 532)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (203, 258, 532)-net over F2, using
(258−55, 258, 7972)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (203, 258, 7973)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (203, 257, 7973)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 231927 751255 210228 221142 451330 283926 128634 092059 995535 610545 690405 639674 511360 > 2257 [i]