Best Known (181, 181+55, s)-Nets in Base 2
(181, 181+55, 201)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (181, 236, 201)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 29, 6)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (152, 207, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 69, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 69, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (2, 29, 6)-net over F2, using
(181, 181+55, 388)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (181, 236, 388)-net over F2, using
(181, 181+55, 4515)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (181, 236, 4516)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (181, 235, 4516)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55509 326346 238763 608421 488608 780512 235171 169361 928960 791868 070412 541508 > 2235 [i]