Best Known (160, 160+56, s)-Nets in Base 2
(160, 160+56, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 216, 195)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 219, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
(160, 160+56, 271)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 216, 271)-net over F2, using
(160, 160+56, 2331)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 216, 2332)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105943 109207 010641 158786 996345 810165 198478 653269 351955 682378 681600 > 2216 [i]