Best Known (148−57, 148, s)-Nets in Base 2
(148−57, 148, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 148, 66)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 152, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 76, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 76, 33)-net over F4, using
(148−57, 148, 80)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (91, 148, 80)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 74, 40)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 39)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 39)-sequence over F4, using
(148−57, 148, 390)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 148, 391)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 147, 391)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 188 199695 172234 489953 409585 039927 356903 192816 > 2147 [i]