Best Known (174−57, 174, s)-Nets in Base 2
(174−57, 174, 72)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (117, 174, 72)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 30, 6)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (87, 144, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- digital (2, 30, 6)-net over F2, using
(174−57, 174, 86)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(117, 174, 86)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 87, 43)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
(174−57, 174, 129)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (117, 174, 129)-net over F2, using
(174−57, 174, 777)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (117, 174, 778)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (117, 173, 778)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12059 813686 658234 302745 898044 246430 810371 678129 722944 > 2173 [i]