Best Known (162−58, 162, s)-Nets in Base 2
(162−58, 162, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 162, 68)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (104, 166, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 83, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 83, 34)-net over F4, using
(162−58, 162, 100)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (104, 162, 100)-net over F2, using
(162−58, 162, 519)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 162, 520)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 107553 132099 754063 291193 165362 681299 358671 623232 > 2162 [i]