Best Known (93, 93+58, s)-Nets in Base 2
(93, 93+58, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 151, 66)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 156, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 78, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 78, 33)-net over F4, using
(93, 93+58, 80)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (93, 151, 80)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 152, 80)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 76, 40)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 39)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 39)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 76, 40)-net over F4, using
(93, 93+58, 389)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 151, 390)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2867 313564 035361 123060 187831 081743 311961 285232 > 2151 [i]