Best Known (240−59, 240, s)-Nets in Base 2
(240−59, 240, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (181, 240, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (180, 240, 195)-net over F2, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 249, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 83, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 83, 65)-net over F8, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 249, 195)-net over F2, using
(240−59, 240, 341)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (181, 240, 341)-net over F2, using
(240−59, 240, 3489)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (181, 240, 3490)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (181, 239, 3490)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 888746 974235 962324 592050 458229 983256 134601 247319 614789 273872 260789 886376 > 2239 [i]