Best Known (241−59, 241, s)-Nets in Base 2
(241−59, 241, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 241, 195)-net over F2, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
(241−59, 241, 346)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (182, 241, 346)-net over F2, using
(241−59, 241, 3574)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 241, 3575)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (182, 240, 3575)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 771088 370421 312641 091184 744709 125753 496089 220935 630426 944668 308966 980144 > 2240 [i]