Best Known (242−59, 242, s)-Nets in Base 2
(242−59, 242, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (183, 242, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (182, 242, 195)-net over F2, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
(242−59, 242, 351)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (183, 242, 351)-net over F2, using
(242−59, 242, 3662)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (183, 242, 3663)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (183, 241, 3663)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 555877 598949 210990 607138 158915 792740 133036 973740 156768 204493 346715 963632 > 2241 [i]