Best Known (135, 135+59, s)-Nets in Base 2
(135, 135+59, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (135, 194, 112)-net over F2, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (135, 204, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 102, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 102, 56)-net over F4, using
(135, 135+59, 169)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (135, 194, 169)-net over F2, using
(135, 135+59, 1134)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (135, 194, 1135)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (135, 193, 1135)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12857 116809 007865 233668 463581 924060 232178 233643 156223 335912 > 2193 [i]