Best Known (95, 95+59, s)-Nets in Base 2
(95, 95+59, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 154, 66)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (95, 160, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 80, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 80, 33)-net over F4, using
(95, 95+59, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (95, 154, 82)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (18, 77, 41)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 41, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
(95, 95+59, 410)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 154, 411)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 153, 411)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 11448 400476 757732 401276 625304 216132 674067 618288 > 2153 [i]