Best Known (43−6, 43, s)-Nets in Base 2
(43−6, 43, 16382)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 43, 16382)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (37, 44, 16382)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(244, 16382, F2, 7, 7) (dual of [(16382, 7), 114630, 8]-NRT-code), using
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(244, 16383, F2, 3, 7) (dual of [(16383, 3), 49105, 8]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(244, 16382, F2, 7, 7) (dual of [(16382, 7), 114630, 8]-NRT-code), using
(43−6, 43, 16383)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (37, 43, 16383)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(243, 16383, F2, 6, 6) (dual of [(16383, 6), 98255, 7]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(243, 16383, F2, 5, 6) (dual of [(16383, 5), 81872, 7]-NRT-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(243, 16383, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(16383, 2), 32723, 7]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(243, 16383, F2, 5, 6) (dual of [(16383, 5), 81872, 7]-NRT-code), using
(43−6, 43, 37505)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 43, 37506)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 8 796095 506388 > 243 [i]