Best Known (49−6, 49, s)-Nets in Base 2
(49−6, 49, 65534)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 49, 65534)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (43, 50, 65534)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(250, 65534, F2, 7, 7) (dual of [(65534, 7), 458688, 8]-NRT-code), using
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(250, 65535, F2, 3, 7) (dual of [(65535, 3), 196555, 8]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(250, 65534, F2, 7, 7) (dual of [(65534, 7), 458688, 8]-NRT-code), using
(49−6, 49, 65535)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (43, 49, 65535)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(249, 65535, F2, 6, 6) (dual of [(65535, 6), 393161, 7]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(249, 65535, F2, 5, 6) (dual of [(65535, 5), 327626, 7]-NRT-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(249, 65535, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(65535, 2), 131021, 7]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(249, 65535, F2, 5, 6) (dual of [(65535, 5), 327626, 7]-NRT-code), using
(49−6, 49, 150035)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 49, 150036)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 562 950119 535543 > 249 [i]