Best Known (242−60, 242, s)-Nets in Base 2
(242−60, 242, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 242, 195)-net over F2, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
(242−60, 242, 335)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (182, 242, 335)-net over F2, using
(242−60, 242, 3184)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 242, 3185)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 067635 371445 850378 838254 566013 268314 450205 138216 253016 236215 546763 570832 > 2242 [i]