Best Known (243−60, 243, s)-Nets in Base 2
(243−60, 243, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (183, 243, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (182, 243, 195)-net over F2, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
(243−60, 243, 340)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (183, 243, 340)-net over F2, using
(243−60, 243, 3260)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (183, 243, 3261)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14 203037 431488 352476 683295 541729 035481 577947 497483 331120 159517 324323 744468 > 2243 [i]