Best Known (106, 106+60, s)-Nets in Base 2
(106, 106+60, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 166, 68)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (106, 170, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 85, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 85, 34)-net over F4, using
(106, 106+60, 99)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (106, 166, 99)-net over F2, using
(106, 106+60, 514)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 166, 515)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 94 212151 579011 793912 760936 376132 235283 369747 587968 > 2166 [i]