Best Known (135, 135+60, s)-Nets in Base 2
(135, 135+60, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (135, 195, 112)-net over F2, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (135, 204, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 102, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 102, 56)-net over F4, using
(135, 135+60, 165)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (135, 195, 165)-net over F2, using
(135, 135+60, 1046)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (135, 195, 1047)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 50974 386725 216395 705641 162774 487224 750550 394882 944621 179008 > 2195 [i]