Best Known (160−62, 160, s)-Nets in Base 2
(160−62, 160, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (98, 160, 66)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (98, 166, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 83, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 83, 33)-net over F4, using
(160−62, 160, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (98, 160, 82)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (18, 80, 41)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 41, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
(160−62, 160, 400)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (98, 160, 401)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 522053 376620 608343 938945 427157 229968 362585 280512 > 2160 [i]