Best Known (245−62, 245, s)-Nets in Base 2
(245−62, 245, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (183, 245, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (182, 245, 195)-net over F2, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
(245−62, 245, 321)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (183, 245, 321)-net over F2, using
(245−62, 245, 2926)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (183, 245, 2927)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56 566106 020870 957288 089607 666363 535279 187001 029657 708886 628034 934694 546244 > 2245 [i]