Best Known (209−63, 209, s)-Nets in Base 2
(209−63, 209, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 209, 112)-net over F2, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (146, 226, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 113, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 113, 56)-net over F4, using
(209−63, 209, 183)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (146, 209, 183)-net over F2, using
(209−63, 209, 1254)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 209, 1255)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (146, 208, 1255)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 416 880798 149134 465746 244576 000029 618240 465209 598329 551359 575304 > 2208 [i]