Best Known (245−63, 245, s)-Nets in Base 2
(245−63, 245, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 245, 195)-net over F2, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
(245−63, 245, 308)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (182, 245, 308)-net over F2, using
(245−63, 245, 2861)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 245, 2862)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (182, 244, 2862)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28 501957 155822 083356 352186 029467 661222 231013 563147 756789 763292 717319 286312 > 2244 [i]