Best Known (230−64, 230, s)-Nets in Base 2
(230−64, 230, 144)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (166, 230, 144)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (165, 230, 144)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 231, 144)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 77, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 77, 48)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 231, 144)-net over F2, using
(230−64, 230, 241)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (166, 230, 241)-net over F2, using
(230−64, 230, 1817)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (166, 230, 1818)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1742 629330 331470 306620 734167 006172 087757 001042 203807 110253 865536 871800 > 2230 [i]