Best Known (246−65, 246, s)-Nets in Base 2
(246−65, 246, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (181, 246, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (180, 246, 195)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 249, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 83, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 83, 65)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 249, 195)-net over F2, using
(246−65, 246, 289)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (181, 246, 289)-net over F2, using
(246−65, 246, 2533)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (181, 246, 2534)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (181, 245, 2534)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 57 227120 846545 674265 501081 616883 468137 282783 184725 145687 780132 118043 773371 > 2245 [i]