Best Known (248−65, 248, s)-Nets in Base 2
(248−65, 248, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (183, 248, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (182, 248, 195)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
(248−65, 248, 297)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (183, 248, 297)-net over F2, using
(248−65, 248, 2647)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (183, 248, 2648)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (183, 247, 2648)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 228 206694 307735 101747 373896 084894 211343 076819 089250 691028 825328 053370 362866 > 2247 [i]