Best Known (119, 119+65, s)-Nets in Base 2
(119, 119+65, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (119, 184, 68)-net over F2, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (119, 196, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 98, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 98, 34)-net over F4, using
(119, 119+65, 84)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(119, 184, 84)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 92, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
(119, 119+65, 114)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (119, 184, 114)-net over F2, using
(119, 119+65, 627)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (119, 184, 628)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (119, 183, 628)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 516567 556716 799879 158870 290552 848139 553544 607599 331497 > 2183 [i]