Best Known (209−66, 209, s)-Nets in Base 2
(209−66, 209, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 209, 112)-net over F2, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 220, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 110, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 110, 56)-net over F4, using
(209−66, 209, 164)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (143, 209, 164)-net over F2, using
(209−66, 209, 1013)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 209, 1014)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 838 103677 597749 966118 658476 358382 160361 277115 308312 240599 449179 > 2209 [i]