Best Known (216−66, 216, s)-Nets in Base 2
(216−66, 216, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (150, 216, 112)-net over F2, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (150, 234, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 117, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 117, 56)-net over F4, using
(216−66, 216, 182)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (150, 216, 182)-net over F2, using
(216−66, 216, 1181)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (150, 216, 1182)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 107064 422804 176189 488901 000299 988793 998565 071885 438128 303455 651580 > 2216 [i]