Best Known (248−66, 248, s)-Nets in Base 2
(248−66, 248, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 248, 195)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 252, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 84, 65)-net over F8, using
(248−66, 248, 286)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (182, 248, 286)-net over F2, using
(248−66, 248, 2359)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 248, 2360)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 456 290056 502902 192624 427028 177142 229212 526351 477061 030970 991687 452506 301463 > 2248 [i]