Best Known (109, 109+66, s)-Nets in Base 2
(109, 109+66, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (109, 175, 68)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (109, 176, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 88, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 88, 34)-net over F4, using
(109, 109+66, 94)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (109, 175, 94)-net over F2, using
(109, 109+66, 472)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (109, 175, 473)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 48890 385944 955451 346409 876005 466967 942369 814174 786780 > 2175 [i]