Best Known (138, 138+67, s)-Nets in Base 2
(138, 138+67, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 205, 112)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (138, 210, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 105, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 105, 56)-net over F4, using
(138, 138+67, 149)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (138, 205, 149)-net over F2, using
(138, 138+67, 907)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 205, 908)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (138, 204, 908)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 25 980905 041186 697979 659091 269679 616052 274907 670577 680829 351332 > 2204 [i]