Best Known (143, 143+68, s)-Nets in Base 2
(143, 143+68, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 211, 112)-net over F2, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 220, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 110, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 110, 56)-net over F4, using
(143, 143+68, 158)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (143, 211, 158)-net over F2, using
(143, 143+68, 949)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 211, 950)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3314 602394 761250 650240 579070 102776 410632 588398 055098 664504 718654 > 2211 [i]